Misc shorts, again
Sep. 22nd, 2004 12:37 pmI wish I knew how I managed to get a bruise on the back of my hand. It's rather hurty, I assume because it's more bones than flesh there.
I had to get off the packed train I was on this morning. The announcement said it was going out of service, because it was "crippled". Not the first word I would think of.
Doors on one train had the message "Doors do not recycle." Which seemed an odd thing to say, since they obviously don't revolve, nor are they likely to be reused. I assume the intent was to tell people that the doors don't rebound (unlike most elevator doors), but I'm still a bit uncertain.
The Piazza San Marco is a trapezoid. Somehow, this pleases me. (Is it bad to have had a trapezoid-filled afternoon?)
I had to get off the packed train I was on this morning. The announcement said it was going out of service, because it was "crippled". Not the first word I would think of.
Doors on one train had the message "Doors do not recycle." Which seemed an odd thing to say, since they obviously don't revolve, nor are they likely to be reused. I assume the intent was to tell people that the doors don't rebound (unlike most elevator doors), but I'm still a bit uncertain.
The Piazza San Marco is a trapezoid. Somehow, this pleases me. (Is it bad to have had a trapezoid-filled afternoon?)
Non-recycling doors
Date: 2004-09-22 09:44 am (UTC)The first time I saw them, I assumed it was a snarky take on the T's environmental policy.
If "disabled" is a more polite way to say "crippled" then maybe the T is dissing their trains :)
Re: Non-recycling doors
Date: 2004-09-22 09:58 am (UTC)Funny how the conductor went straight from "out of service" to "crippled." Do not pass "disabled," do not collect $200. :-)
Re: Non-recycling doors
Date: 2004-09-22 12:40 pm (UTC)Re: Non-recycling doors
Date: 2004-09-22 01:15 pm (UTC)Re: Non-recycling doors
Date: 2004-09-22 07:39 pm (UTC)Re: $200
Date: 2004-09-23 03:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 09:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 09:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 10:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 06:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 09:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 09:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 10:02 am (UTC)I promise to leave nice flowers.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 12:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 12:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 01:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 10:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 12:06 pm (UTC)(Which is not so far off what I was thinking, either :-)
no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 12:21 pm (UTC)Yup, that's what I've assumed. The thing is, this sign is only on the inside. I once was trying to get into a subway car and stuck out my book or something as I was approaching the closing door and yeah, the door shut pretty tightly around it and practically yanked that book out of my hand as the train rolled off. I was just glad I hadn't stuck out my arm! That's a very dangerous feature if you ask me.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 01:20 pm (UTC)I noticed this morning that not all subway cars have them. I don't know if this means that only some of them are signed, or only some of them act like that, while the rest of them do rebound, or recycle, or recoil, or whatever the proper verb is.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 02:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 03:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 04:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 03:42 am (UTC)I wonder what % of trains have the non-rebounding doors, and whether they're slated to be replaced sooner rather than later...
no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 05:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-24 01:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-24 04:15 am (UTC)That's excellent. I wonder if Boston could use that plan ;-).