Browsing friendsfriends, I found this description of a new meme.
Somehow this sounded more like a game to me (hey, Queue - another game that wouldn't require any materials). The first person starts with som ething (person/place/object, or possibly an idea, I suppose, in a variant version), and the other/next player names something that defeats it (see examples in the orginal description), until someone plays Moses (hey, I'm Jewish, I don't feel like having J esus be the ultimate) or [Hm. I don't know much at all about actors, so while Kevin Bacon is entertaining, I suppose, I'd never play him. Anyone have another end conditional to put here?].
I think if there are points at all, they're awarded for entertainment value/coolness, rather more like in the 10,000 Blank White Cards sort of game, rather than more traditional ones.
c
(from TheoMachio)
How it works: Someone (me) posts a picture. Your mission is to reply post with a picture that "defeats" my picture. In turn, someone replies with a picture that defeats that one, and so on. So, for example, if I posted a map of France, someone could post a picture of Hitler, then someone could post a picture of FDR. Then someone could post a picture of the polio virus. Then someone co uld post a picture of Jonas Salk. The games goes until someone plays Jesus or Kevin Bacon.
Somehow this sounded more like a game to me (hey, Queue - another game that wouldn't require any materials). The first person starts with som ething (person/place/object, or possibly an idea, I suppose, in a variant version), and the other/next player names something that defeats it (see examples in the orginal description), until someone plays Moses (hey, I'm Jewish, I don't feel like having J esus be the ultimate) or [Hm. I don't know much at all about actors, so while Kevin Bacon is entertaining, I suppose, I'd never play him. Anyone have another end conditional to put here?].
I think if there are points at all, they're awarded for entertainment value/coolness, rather more like in the 10,000 Blank White Cards sort of game, rather than more traditional ones.
c
no subject
Date: 2003-03-24 08:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-24 08:55 am (UTC)ยต
no subject
Date: 2003-03-24 10:46 am (UTC)Unfortunately, the rules to Mornington Crescent prohibit me from telling you the rules.
The journey begins . . .
no subject
Date: 2003-03-24 10:54 am (UTC)That is all.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-24 11:06 am (UTC)Do yourself a favor; under any circumstances. Even taking this small action constitutes a move in the game of Mornington Crescent, and a very annoying one, at that.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-24 11:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-24 11:35 am (UTC)I'll just reply to my own comment, then
Date: 2003-03-24 11:11 am (UTC)Re: I'll just reply to my own comment, then
Date: 2003-03-24 02:36 pm (UTC)So,
no subject
Date: 2003-03-24 09:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-24 09:55 am (UTC)It sounds like something that would test my ability to draw (my ability to get laughs at my sketches while playing Pictionary definitely exceeds my ability to sketch...). Fun, though. Hrm, how to counter thermonuclear devices....
e
no subject
Date: 2003-03-24 10:13 am (UTC)The U.N.? Oh, wait, no . . .
no subject
Date: 2003-03-24 10:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-24 11:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-24 10:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-24 10:39 am (UTC)Really, much like the blank white cards game :-)
e