magid: (Default)
[personal profile] magid
Another lesson last night in not making assumptions: I saw a man wearing a black velvet kippah, his head mostly shaved except for his long payes, which were twisted up behind his ears. Given that, I would not have expected him to be wearing a white T-shirt, knee-length shorts, and slip-on Birks.


First swag at the new job: a dark blue 2005 NCTM mug.


Someone who has lost weight and kept it off: successful loser


To whom it may concern,

I'm glad you Support Our Troops, but I would prefer that your support does not involve putting a sticker on my car. I notice that you carefully lined it up with my parking permits; perhaps you should look for a job in layout or design?


Vegetable fates, so far: roasted some zukes and squish, and the cauliflower; sauteed the corn with caramelized onions, scallions, soy milk, and cayenne. Next up: stir fry carrots, napa, and onions with tofu; put the rest of the cabbage into the end of the Asian slaw dressing from last week; roast more veggies (more zukes? potatoes? beets? garlic?); make a plum pie, perhaps with some apple as well; orange-cranberry relish.


I saw the headline "Lawmaker fears candy sparks taste for drugs," and had to find out what would make a (state) legislator say something quite that stupid. I mean, Snickers --> cocaine? But it turns out that there are marijuana-flavored lollipops (Who knew? Well, lots of people, surely, but not me.), and Rep. Aaron Peña would like to ban them in TX. The Houston Chronicle article goes on to say, "Makers of the candies say they aren't marketing to children and accuse some politicians of trying to make a name for themselves by targeting their product." The candies have the flavor, but not the chemicals that make people high. I can see why someone might want to outlaw them, but the product itself isn't illegal. Restricting them to adults, along with cigarettes and alcohol, that makes more sense to me.

Date: 2005-07-21 03:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] queue.livejournal.com
non-alcoholic beer isn't age-restricted, is it?

Date: 2005-07-21 03:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] magid.livejournal.com
Not that I know of.

Two points: beer is legal for those over 21 (or is it 18 again?), while marijuana is (currently) illegal for everyone (including those who raise their own and use it for medically-recommended pain relief, which I find absurd). Also, I don't know how similar non-alcoholic beer is to alcoholic beer, whether it's more or less similar than the tastes of this candy and marijuana.

Date: 2005-07-21 03:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hammercock.livejournal.com
Someone put a sticker on your car? Jeez, that's irritating!

Date: 2005-07-21 03:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] magid.livejournal.com
Yeah, it pissed me off. I noticed it when I came out of the gym, so I think it happened in Porter, though there's a (small) chance I didn't notice it earlier (but I did walk to the car from an angle that would've been easy to see).

Luckily, I was able to peel it off, otherwise I would've been even more annoyed.

Profile

magid: (Default)
magid

February 2026

S M T W T F S
12 3 4567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 11th, 2026 03:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios