Scavenger hunt
Oct. 12th, 2006 10:09 amWhen I was little, I always wanted either a treasure hunt or a scavenger hunt for my birthday. I never had one, because I'd've had to have organized it enough that I couldn't be a participant, which is what I most wanted.
I think about this every so often, how fun it could be, but never found a way around this difficulty, until a couple of weeks ago. If each scavenger hunt participant came with n things to be found/photographed (written on individual pieces of paper) and those things were randomly divided between teams, it might work, especially if each team is allowed one or two things to not get (to balance out different levels of difficulty in item acquisition).
Does this sound like it would work?
I think about this every so often, how fun it could be, but never found a way around this difficulty, until a couple of weeks ago. If each scavenger hunt participant came with n things to be found/photographed (written on individual pieces of paper) and those things were randomly divided between teams, it might work, especially if each team is allowed one or two things to not get (to balance out different levels of difficulty in item acquisition).
Does this sound like it would work?
no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 02:34 pm (UTC)(And I have a hard time asking for things, especially ones that aren't really necessary. Plus, I'd like all my friends to play :-)
no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 02:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 04:51 pm (UTC)I'm thinking good weather is definitely preferable; maybe sometime this spring.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 05:50 pm (UTC)Excellent. Though, as I said to JB, I don't think there's time to fit this in before spring. I should look into when the spring Jewish holidays are (Purim and Passover).
no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 09:53 pm (UTC)I suppose you'd also have to say that you can't collect point for acquiring things on the list you yourself wrote (or perhaps that you absolutely have to have those things or they're worth negative points). That would balance it a bit as typically (if someone were running the game) harder items would be assigned more or less points.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 10:01 pm (UTC)The other option is, collect everything by digital camera (in which case some of the items could be more along the lines of illustrating something - for example I played a game like that in San Francisco a few years ago and one of the things we had to do was illustrate the stages of a drug in 5 photos The creativity angle was really fun and when the game was scored there were points for collecting things and bonus points for creativity which were awarded by a vote of all the players. Hmm, in which case we'd want a projector and a laptop at the last stop so that we could do a slide show of all the entries.)
Um, yeah. I'd like to play.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 10:32 pm (UTC)Basically, I was thinking this would be more like a game of Apples to Apples or party Quiddler, where the fun is in the doing and the acclaim for 'good ones', rather than a weighted point system. I can see doing that, but for a more formal hunt (Everyone would wear white gloves and top hats for that one :-).
And, color me not surprised :-).
no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 02:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 05:56 pm (UTC)