Spending like it's almost presidential
May. 29th, 2007 01:27 pmFrom this story in the Houston Chronicle: funding requests for former Presidents Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton, fiscal 2008.
Total
• Carter: $518,000
• Bush: $786,000
• Clinton: $1.16 million
Given the totals, it's not surprising how the Chronicle spins the story against Clinton. However, as always, the devil's in the details.
Pension
• Carter: $191,000
• Bush: $191,000
• Clinton: $201,000
Staff
• Carter: $98,000
• Bush: $160,000
• Clinton: $161,000
Travel
• Carter: $2,000
• Bush: $56,000
• Clinton: $50,000
Rent
• Carter: $102,000
• Bush: $175,000
• Clinton: $516,000
Telephone
• Carter: $10,000
• Bush: $17,000
• Clinton: $79,000
Postage
• Carter: $15,000
• Bush: $13,000
• Clinton: $15,000
Other services
• Carter: $83,000
• Bush: $76,000
• Clinton: $65,000
Printing
• Carter: $5,000
• Bush: $14,000
• Clinton: $14,000
Supplies
• Carter: $5,000
• Bush: $15,000
• Clinton: $26,000
Equipment
• Carter: $7,000
• Bush: $69,000
• Clinton: $35,000
Sources: Congressional Research Service, General Services Administration allowances for former presidents, fiscal 2008 request
Clinton's office is in NYC, which accounts for the majority of the difference (rent). He's also got significantly higher phone costs than the other two, which does surprise me. And the extra $10K for pension doesn't make any sense either. I think there definitely are questions that can be asked, but I don't believe that Clinton's duping the feds as the article implies.
Also, Carter? Continues to be the best investment in a former president. His expenses are the lowest (he's not in an expensive area, among other things), and he's doing all kinds of humanitarian works.
Total
• Carter: $518,000
• Bush: $786,000
• Clinton: $1.16 million
Given the totals, it's not surprising how the Chronicle spins the story against Clinton. However, as always, the devil's in the details.
Pension
• Carter: $191,000
• Bush: $191,000
• Clinton: $201,000
Staff
• Carter: $98,000
• Bush: $160,000
• Clinton: $161,000
Travel
• Carter: $2,000
• Bush: $56,000
• Clinton: $50,000
Rent
• Carter: $102,000
• Bush: $175,000
• Clinton: $516,000
Telephone
• Carter: $10,000
• Bush: $17,000
• Clinton: $79,000
Postage
• Carter: $15,000
• Bush: $13,000
• Clinton: $15,000
Other services
• Carter: $83,000
• Bush: $76,000
• Clinton: $65,000
Printing
• Carter: $5,000
• Bush: $14,000
• Clinton: $14,000
Supplies
• Carter: $5,000
• Bush: $15,000
• Clinton: $26,000
Equipment
• Carter: $7,000
• Bush: $69,000
• Clinton: $35,000
Sources: Congressional Research Service, General Services Administration allowances for former presidents, fiscal 2008 request
Clinton's office is in NYC, which accounts for the majority of the difference (rent). He's also got significantly higher phone costs than the other two, which does surprise me. And the extra $10K for pension doesn't make any sense either. I think there definitely are questions that can be asked, but I don't believe that Clinton's duping the feds as the article implies.
Also, Carter? Continues to be the best investment in a former president. His expenses are the lowest (he's not in an expensive area, among other things), and he's doing all kinds of humanitarian works.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 05:58 pm (UTC)its a drop in the bucket either way.
I figure that the higher phone costs come from the fact that clinton is likely the most active of the three. I suspect that the most recent former president is often the most active especially when there has been a change in party power. Clinton is the most recent democratic president so he is going to be called upon more often than he would be if there was a democrat in office.
Why call up Bush Sr when you can call up the current president.
I suspect the same applies to travel expenses.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 06:08 pm (UTC)About the phone spending: I think Carter's also pretty active, but some of his costs are covered by the institutions he works with, while Clinton's playing the field (as it were :-). Also, Clinton's wife is campaigning (not sure how much campaigning he does for her, either) and/or off in DC, and presumably they talk sometimes...
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 09:07 pm (UTC)He is both more recent than the other two, and the only one to serve a second term. I can see either being a factor.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 02:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 05:35 pm (UTC)I easily picture Clinton spending lots of time schmoozing on the phone in order to get things accomplished.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 06:54 pm (UTC)