I'm melting...
Aug. 28th, 2003 08:41 pmIt occurred to me this afternoon that 'melting pot' is a pretty strange sort of phrase. If it parallels things like 'pizza pan', it's a pot for melting things in. I guess I don't melt stuff very much, since this doesn't seem very useful to me. If I start thinking about how it's used to mean society blending into a whole, I can easily hare off into horrid thoughts of nazism... but I'm not going there. I'm not, I tell you. No baldness at all.
I checked dictionary.com; a melting pot is indeed a utensil for melting, aka a crucible. Hmmm... I wonder how far this analogy for a blended society would have come had the wordmeister involved used the word 'crucible'? Not very far, I'd bet, especially after Arthur Miller's play. Though perhaps he'd not have called it that had the word been in use that way.
I know that Canada uses a completely different idea for its kind of blending society. And, yes, dictionary.com includes a quote about it. Score! I'd thought it was a mosaic (the one they cite), but part of me wondered whether salad might not have been used. Both show the idea of the distinct parts making up a whole while keeping their individual characteristics, which is a much more appealing paradigm, really. I look at Canada, and see a place where there's huge numbers of immigrants, but there are not the same issues that there are here. It's not perfect; there's all sorts of questions of language with the Quebecois, for instance. And yet, we ostensibly tout our mantra of individuality, yet really the way to get along is to become like everyone else. Why else the English-only referenda, or the proliferation of skinheads and other separatists (over whatever issue), not to mention a judge not understanding how his statue might violate the divide between church and state. By gum, the 10 commandments are just right, no matter what your religion! Who could argue with them? And so on.
I think it wouldn't bother me so much if America didn't seem to keep on playing the role of a country that's got it together. And it doesn't, on so many fronts. It's a far better country than many (most?), despite the current politics I hate, but there's so much that should be fixed at home before we try to fix the rest of the world into our own image (which scares me for lots of other reasons as well. How arrogant can we be?).
Today an NPR reporter mentioned a 'gas-powered turban'. I don't doubt that 'gas-powered turbine' was meant, but, oh, the visions of Ali Baba flying under his own turban power...
I checked dictionary.com; a melting pot is indeed a utensil for melting, aka a crucible. Hmmm... I wonder how far this analogy for a blended society would have come had the wordmeister involved used the word 'crucible'? Not very far, I'd bet, especially after Arthur Miller's play. Though perhaps he'd not have called it that had the word been in use that way.
I know that Canada uses a completely different idea for its kind of blending society. And, yes, dictionary.com includes a quote about it. Score! I'd thought it was a mosaic (the one they cite), but part of me wondered whether salad might not have been used. Both show the idea of the distinct parts making up a whole while keeping their individual characteristics, which is a much more appealing paradigm, really. I look at Canada, and see a place where there's huge numbers of immigrants, but there are not the same issues that there are here. It's not perfect; there's all sorts of questions of language with the Quebecois, for instance. And yet, we ostensibly tout our mantra of individuality, yet really the way to get along is to become like everyone else. Why else the English-only referenda, or the proliferation of skinheads and other separatists (over whatever issue), not to mention a judge not understanding how his statue might violate the divide between church and state. By gum, the 10 commandments are just right, no matter what your religion! Who could argue with them? And so on.
I think it wouldn't bother me so much if America didn't seem to keep on playing the role of a country that's got it together. And it doesn't, on so many fronts. It's a far better country than many (most?), despite the current politics I hate, but there's so much that should be fixed at home before we try to fix the rest of the world into our own image (which scares me for lots of other reasons as well. How arrogant can we be?).
Today an NPR reporter mentioned a 'gas-powered turban'. I don't doubt that 'gas-powered turbine' was meant, but, oh, the visions of Ali Baba flying under his own turban power...
10 C's/NPR pronunciation
Date: 2003-08-28 06:19 pm (UTC)2-Erm, that's how I'd have pronounced it, too.
no subject
Date: 2003-08-28 07:43 pm (UTC)WANT.
no subject
Date: 2003-08-28 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-29 03:39 am (UTC)(In other words, mentioning the sky-blue turban one of my cow orkers was wearing when I saw him earlier this week just didn't seem likely to resonate as an image for anyone else...)
Your bits of description make me want to read this book even more...
Re: 10 C's/NPR pronunciation
Date: 2003-08-29 03:45 am (UTC)2- I think I've heard it pronounced with a long i, or with a short i (though that always sounded strange to me: what's that e doing hanging out at the end if not to make the i long? [1]), but not a drawl that turned it into an a-sound.
[1] Oh, hell, now I have images of E-the-super-hero, with the power to make all vowels long! Behold the mighty E!
no subject
Date: 2003-08-29 03:46 am (UTC)Re: 10 C's/NPR pronunciation
Date: 2003-08-29 04:14 am (UTC)2. Oh. I'm trying to figure out how the NPR person pronounced it now . . .
[1] There's a song by Tom Lehrer you might like, all about "E" and how it transforms words *grin*
Re: 10 C's/NPR pronunciation
Date: 2003-08-29 04:18 am (UTC)2- I can't describe it better than I did, but somehow it clearly crossed the short i/ drawled a boundary in my head, though perhaps no one else would've thought that.
[1] Do you have that song? I'd love to hear it (another Tom Lehrer song I'd not heard of. I blush.)
crucibles
Date: 2003-08-29 04:20 am (UTC)Re: crucibles
Date: 2003-08-29 04:24 am (UTC)I assume it was a subtext for Miller, actually, since there was no other reason for choosing that in the title.
Tom Lehrer song
Date: 2003-08-29 04:30 am (UTC)Re: crucibles
Date: 2003-08-29 04:50 am (UTC)Re: crucibles
Date: 2003-08-29 05:08 am (UTC)Re: Tom Lehrer song
Date: 2003-08-29 06:26 am (UTC)That rings some bells, actually. I probably heard that song, ages ago now. I certainly couldn't sing it (not like some of the Schoolhouse Rock stuff!). I hadn't realized that Lehrer wrote songs for the Electric Company, either. Cool.
Re: crucibles
Date: 2003-08-29 06:28 am (UTC)Er, salad. Yup.
no subject
Date: 2003-08-29 07:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-29 07:15 am (UTC)I don't recognize 'Qamar al-Zaman and His Two Sons'. I feel ill-read.
So... if you're reading the second volume, can I borrow the first?
Re: crucibles
Date: 2003-08-29 09:56 am (UTC)